We built an SOA automation engine with human-in-the-loop review designed specifically for Australian financial advisers. Your adviser gathers the client's situation, goals, and strategy — our tool drafts a compliant, personalised Statement of Advice in hours instead of the 10–20 hours your team currently spends writing one from scratch. Every SOA goes through human review before it reaches the client. The tool does the heavy lifting. Your people do the thinking.
30-minute demo · See it run on a real scenario · No commitment
The advice takes an hour. The SOA takes 10–20 hours. Your paraplanner opens a Word template, copies sections from the last similar client, manually updates every reference — client name, fund details, insurance amounts, risk profile, fee disclosures — and hopes nothing was missed. Then compliance reviews it, finds 6 issues, and it goes back for another round. Meanwhile the client is waiting, the adviser has moved on to the next meeting, and the SOA queue is growing.
You've tried templating. You've tried outsourcing to offshore paraplanners. You've tried SOA software that promised automation but delivered a slightly better mail merge. The templates still need 8 hours of manual customisation. The offshore team doesn't understand Australian regulatory nuances. The software produces output that reads like it was written by someone who's never seen an ASIC compliance review.
The bottleneck isn't your advisers. It's the document that sits between the advice and the implementation.
Adviser enters the client's situation, goals, risk profile, existing products, and recommended strategy. No 40-page questionnaire. Structured inputs that map to the sections of the SOA.
The engine generates a full Statement of Advice: current situation analysis, basis for advice, recommended strategy, product recommendations, fee disclosure, risk warnings, and alternative strategies considered. Written in natural language. Compliant with current ASIC RG 175 requirements.
A paraplanner or compliance officer reviews the draft inside the tool. They can edit any section, flag items for adviser input, and approve or reject specific recommendations. Nothing goes to the client without a human sign-off.
The reviewed SOA is exported as a branded, formatted document ready for the client. Your logo, your disclosure language, your compliance sign-off. It looks like your document because it is your document.
The tool generates a complete SOA that includes: executive summary of advice, client's current financial situation, goals and objectives, basis for advice and why this strategy, product and fund recommendations with rationale, risk profile assessment and suitability, insurance recommendations (where applicable), and fee disclosure including ongoing fees and commissions.
Also included: alternative strategies considered and why they were not recommended, and implementation steps. Every section is generated from the specific client inputs — not pulled from a generic library and search-replaced. Two clients with similar strategies but different circumstances get materially different SOAs. That's the difference between automation and mail merge.
The tool is built around ASIC RG 175, the Corporations Act, and current best-interest duty requirements. Not a US financial planning tool with Australian language patched on top. The disclosure requirements, fee structures, and compliance expectations are Australian from the ground up.
Every SOA goes through human review. The tool drafts. Your team approves. This is a deliberate architectural decision, not a limitation. In regulated advice, a human must own the document. We built the tool to respect that requirement, not work around it.
The output matches your practice's tone, formatting, and disclosure language. We configure the tool to your existing SOA structure so the output looks like it came from your team — because it did, after review.
Client data is processed securely and is not used to train models or shared with third parties. Your client's financial situation is not our training data.
The tool generates SOAs aligned with current ASIC RG 175 requirements, best-interest duty obligations, and standard disclosure frameworks. But compliance is ultimately your responsibility — which is why every SOA goes through human review before it reaches the client. The tool gives your reviewer a cleaner, more consistent starting point.
No. It changes what they spend their time on. Instead of 10 hours copying, pasting, and reformatting, they spend 2–3 hours reviewing, refining, and applying judgement. Your paraplanners become reviewers and quality controllers instead of document assemblers.
It will. Not often, but it will. That's why human review is mandatory in the workflow, not optional. The tool flags areas of lower confidence and sections that need adviser confirmation. Your reviewer catches errors before the client ever sees them. This is the same standard you hold your paraplanners to — except the first draft arrives in minutes instead of days.
Yes. We configure the tool to match your SOA structure, branding, disclosure wording, and formatting preferences. The output should be indistinguishable from what your team produces manually — just faster.
Typical onboarding takes 2–3 weeks. We configure the tool to your advice process, SOA structure, product list, and compliance requirements. We run test scenarios with your team before going live. You don't switch over until you're confident in the output.
The tool handles standard personal advice well out of the box. Complex scenarios like SMSFs, estate planning, or multi-entity structures may require more human input and review time. The tool still generates the framework and standard sections — your paraplanner adds the complexity. Even on complex cases, you're saving 50–60% of the drafting time.
Send us a de-identified client scenario — situation, goals, and strategy. We'll run it through the tool and send you the draft SOA within 24 hours. You compare it against what your team would have produced manually. If it doesn't save you meaningful time, walk away.
30 minutes · Real scenario · Draft SOA delivered within 24 hours · No commitment